Restoring friction surfaces of machine parts
01Normal operation
Key conditions for revitalization
Metal-on-metal friction
Metal surfaces touch directly: the active component builds a protective layer where there is micro-deformation and wear.
Lubricant or fuel
Carries the active particles to the surfaces and supplies the carbon for the crystal lattice of the metal-ceramic.
Closed friction cycle
Oil circulates, gear teeth and raceways come into contact again and again, so active particles keep reaching the friction zone.
01 · NORMAL LOAD
02 · OIL FILM BREAKS
03 · COATING FORMS
04 · STABILISATION
Click a step to show it in the scene. Steps 2–8 are shown in the scene on the levels “Contact spot” and “Metal under the grains”.
What the values are based on: · ·
Friction and roughness: with and without revitalizant
Laboratory friction-machine test, 2002. Disc-on-block pair: steel 40Kh against grey cast iron SCh-20, IGP-30 oil, 200 rpm, stepped load, 304 h.
By the end of the test, with revitalizant friction was about 4 times and roughness about 3 times lower than without it.
All 9 measurements with revitalizant: table
| Running time, h | Ra, µm | μ |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.2 | 0.121 |
| 21 | 0.75–0.85 | 0.113 |
| 70 | 0.6–0.65 | 0.112 |
| 113 | 0.5–0.55 | 0.103 |
| 139 | 0.4–0.45 | 0.096 |
| 169 | 0.25–0.35 | 0.071 |
| 206 | 0.15–0.22 | 0.047 |
| 261 | 0.1–0.14 | 0.019 |
| 304 | 0.08–0.1 | 0.011 |
Microhardness of the friction surface
Two cases: a laboratory test with a control and a part after service. The result depends on the material pair, the assembly and the operating mode.
800 N, 0.5 m/s. Open circle: the same oil without revitalizant; filled: with revitalizant.
Grey cast iron, about 2000 h of operation. No control: the friction surface is compared with the base metal of the same part.
In the laboratory test microhardness rose from 8 % for bronze to 2.4 times for SChM cast iron. On the liner the friction surface is about 2.8 times harder than the base metal, and already at a depth of about 30 µm the hardness is close to the base.
Tooth thickness: treated and untreated
Traction gearboxes of electric locomotives, 2004–2005. Two electric locomotives: some wheelsets of the traction gearboxes were treated, the others on the same machine ran untreated. Tooth thickness was measured with a gear-tooth vernier over a constant chord before and after 300–363 thousand km.
Change in gear-wheel tooth thickness over the run, mm
Estimated layer on each tooth flank 125–175 µm
Estimated layer on each tooth flank 75–350 µm
Over the run the treated teeth became 0.15–0.70 mm thicker, while untreated teeth on the same machines wore by 0.15–0.75 mm. On the first locomotive all 20 measured treated teeth grew and all 20 untreated teeth shrank.
The amount of build-up is set by the design of the assembly (it does not grow beyond the optimal factory nominal dimensions; the process is self-limiting), and by the initial wear and the operating conditions (the nature of the load).
Micrographs
Images of the particles, samples and parts from the studies of the coating and from the bearing test.
Sources and limitations
- Model and scale The 3D scene illustrates the proposed mechanism. The scale follows the measured depth of increased hardness (20–30 µm): the scene shows a fragment of the friction pair of about 0.7 × 0.27 mm, each part about 0.1 mm high; the scale bar is recalculated when the view is rotated or zoomed. Revitalizant particles (100–500 nm), surface asperities and the modified layer (2–10 µm) are shown enlarged. Load, temperature and the pace of the process are nominal (at 1× the scenario lasts 54 s); the scene does not calculate the properties of a real assembly.
- Microhardness and layer The numbers in the scene are the best measured case: a grey cast-iron diesel cylinder liner after service (2002), base metal 430 HV, friction surface 1185 HV on average; increased hardness extends 20–30 µm¹ deep, and the modified layer on cross-sections is 2–10 µm¹. In laboratory friction-machine tests (1998) with a control run without revitalizant the gain was smaller: 12 % for steel 40Kh (≈583 → 655 HV) and 1.7–2.4 times for cast irons (≈310 → 520–740 HV). Results depend on the material pair, the assembly and the operating mode.
- Friction and roughness The values in the scene come from the friction-machine test (2002): Ra is the midpoint of each measured range; the initial μ = 0.020 before contact is an assumption of the illustration.
- Dimensions Tooth thickness is shown in the measurements above. The measured modified layer (a few micrometres) does not explain a gain of tenths of a millimetre; these measurements did not investigate the mechanism of the dimensional change.
- ¹ Thickness and diffusion depth Coating thickness and the depth of gradient diffusion depend on the design of the specific unit and its operating conditions, the materials of the friction pair (steel, cast iron, aluminium alloys, etc.), the initial wear, the operating conditions during and after treatment, the revitalizant dosage and the number of repeat treatments.
Test protocols and research reports are available on request.
